TUPE: Relocation and ETO #tupe

Daniel Barnett: “Is the requirement to work in a different location following a TUPE transfer a ‘change in the workforce’ within the meaning of the (pre-2014 amendments) TUPE Regulations?

No, held the EAT in NSL v Besagni.The London Borough of Barnet outsourced some of its parking operations and as a result the Claimants’ workplace moved from Barnet to Croydon and Lancing. The Claimants refused to move and were consequently dismissed.

TUPE Regulations provide that an employee is automatically unfairly dismissed if they were dismissed because of the transfer or for a reason connected to the transfer that is not an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce.

The EAT confirmed that, in accordance with Berriman v Delabole Slate Ltd [1985] ICR 546, the phrase ‘changes in the workforce’ does not include a change in the workplace.

The position is likely to be different following the 2014 amendments to the TUPE Regulations which widen the meaning of ‘changes in the workforce’ to include changes in location.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s